Andy Semple

So What Happened to that “Hope and Change?”

 

A little bit of controversy, as Fox News has been “attacked” for this video compilation about Obama's record. I myself can’t understand why, as they simply illustrate what a massive failure President Obama has been.

Surprisingly, Fox have pulled the video from their website. So far this youtube version is still up.

 

Follow Andy on twitter

The Hypocrisy of David Marr and Q&A

 

Marr’s protestations of vilification - originally in an answer about Julia Gillard on 23rd April 2012 at Mossman library. Apparently only applicable to women of the left!

 

 

Follow Andy on twitter

Tyrant Mugabe asked by the UN to Champion Tourism

WTF!

This move by the UN to ask Robert Mugabe, former tyrant of Zimbabwe, accused of mass ethnic cleansing and bankrupting his country by allowing 10,000% inflation, to be a "leader for tourism" illustrates just how dysfunctional the United Nations is. It further shows that the UN is a useless, hopeless gaggle of retards.

Why doesn't Australia - and any other nation that values freedom and the rule of law - resign its seat at the UN and kick the UNcrats out of the country over this?

The capacity for the UN to act so outrageously never ceases to amaze me.

 

 

Follow Andy on twitter

Alan Jones Talks with Climate Depot’s Marc Morano

You can listen here.

 

Follow Andy on twitter

Tweeter Trent Hopkins, tweets

My May 28 blog - Same Sex Marriage: The Sinister Agenda – is reviewed by tweeter Trent Hopkins.

I’m slowly building a fan club.

 

Follow Andy on twitter

BBC Runs Halo Graphic Instead of UN Logo

Personally, I prefer the Halo logo over the BBC logo.

 

 

Follow Andy on twitter

Morgan Poll: LNP with Record 2PP Lead over ALP

Sure it’s another poll, but it’s a devastating poll for Labor.

In the latest Morgan Poll L-NP support is 61.5% (up 3.5% since last week’s face-to-face Morgan Poll) compared to the ALP’s 38.5% (down 3.5%) on a two-party preferred basis according to a face-to-face Morgan Poll conducted last weekend, May 26/27, 2012. This is a record two-party preferred lead for the L-NP in over 70 years of the Morgan Poll based on how electors said they’d vote.

Gary Morgan says:

“Today’s face-to-face Morgan Poll shows a record two-party preferred lead for the L-NP (61.5%) cf. ALP (38.5%) after former Labor MP Craig Thomson addressed Parliament last week to deny any wrongdoing while Secretary of the Health Services Union (HSU).

“Despite Thomson’s denials, doubts about his story have been expressed by all sides of politics and seized upon by the Opposition to raise questions about the legitimacy of the Gillard Government.

“Given the ongoing saga involving Thomson and Fair Work Australia, it is no surprise today’s Morgan Poll shows the L-NP with a record high-share of the two-party preferred vote. The highest L-NP share of the vote in over 70 years of the Morgan Poll — today’s Newspoll showing a swing to the ALP is simply unbelievable.”

Electors were asked: “If a Federal Election for the House of Representatives were held today — which party would receive your first preference?”

The face-to-face Morgan Poll on Federal voting intention was conducted over last weekend, May 26/27, 2012 with an Australia-wide cross-section of 874 Australian electors aged 18+, of all electors surveyed, a low 2.5% did not name a party. Face-to-face polling is more accurate than telephone polling due to the higher response rate achieved compared to other forms of polling including telephone polling and Internet polling.

Yet SkyREDNews is running with the Newspoll published yesterday that amazingly gives Labor a small boost.

Keep in mind that the NSW Liberal/National coalition won last year’s state election with 64.2% of the state-wide two-party preferred vote and that the QLD LNP won this year’s state election with 62.8% of the two-party preferred vote.

Without a shadow of a doubt, given the recent NSW and QLD 2PP votes and the devastating Morgan poll, Labor is politically dead meat.

 

 

Follow Andy on twitter

You Shall Not Call Socialism by its Right Name

UK poet George Bernard Shaw of the Fabian Society once called Lenin, the "greatest Fabian of them all." Why didn’t Shaw say that Lenin was the greatest Marxist or communist of them all? Lenin after all was a communist was he not?

All the radical left care about is perception and that makes Fabians masters of deception (explains why Labor politicians are so deceitful as just about every Labor MP is a Fabian member).

Shaw himself even described the Fabian methodology as using the "methods of stealth, intrigue, subversion, and the deception of never calling socialism by its right name."

Shaw said that socialism meant the "equality of income or nothing." Meaning you would be fed, clothed, lodged, taught and employed - "whether you liked it or not." If the state discovered that you were not worth this trouble, "you might possibly be executed in a kindly manner." To understand the depth of Shaw's commitment to socialism, watch this clip of him advocating mass murder.

The most stunning thing to note is the Fabian Society's coat of arms: - it’s a wolf in sheep's clothing.

The Fabian Society is named after Quintus Fabius Maximus, the Roman general whose strategies of wearing down opponents by delays led to the Roman victory over Hannibal.

The Fabian Society’s goal is the promotion of socialist and progressive thought throughout society. For all intentional purposes, the Australian Labor Party is political arm of the Fabian Society.

 

Follow Andy on twitter

Why the US Economy is Rooted

  

It’s not a question of IF the US collapses, but when.

Maybe this bloke needs to be elected to Congress?

 

 

Follow Andy on twitter

Same Sex Marriage: The Sinister Agenda

Question: How do you go about destroying our democratic capitalist society?  Where do you direct the critical blow so it will do the most damage?  In his Theses on Feuerbach, Karl Marx provided the answer: destroy the traditional family.

That's where same-sex marriage comes in.  It's no mystery why it commands considerable support.  After all, what can be more of a fair go than the idea of granting equality to a formerly persecuted group that has done nothing untoward other than being different in its sexual tastes?  Sort of like being discriminated because of the colour of one's skin (even though many US black leaders, jealously guarding their highly lucrative victimhood, take strong exception to equating gay liberation with the civil rights struggle).  So recognition of same sex unions as legitimate marriages seems to be a harmless idea.  But appearances can be deceptive.  Few things are more destructive than same sex marriage, a poison pill devised to corrode the very core of a healthy society - the institution of marriage.

Not a single society in the history of mankind has ever attempted to substitute homosexual relationships for traditional marriage. Marriage is viewed as sacrosanct and never called into question. Marriage has always been universally understood by all cultures as a biological, social, and economic arrangement to bring into the world and rear the young, thus perpetuating the human species. Indeed, humans took their cue from nature, where the heterosexual family is virtually the sole organising principle of life.

Indeed, so central is marriage to human existence that it forms the basic building block and prototype of any democratic capitalist society.  The many forms of social organisation are but permutations of the basic family pattern - the clan, the tribe, the society and the state are merely an extended family.

But why is same sex marriage unfriendly to the traditional matrimony? How does society suffer if it gives legal sanction to the sharing of gay couples and bestows upon them the rights traditionally granted to spouses? Homosexuals claim they have a right to “marriage” as a civil rights issue. They do not. Homosexual couples already have all the same rights as heterosexual couples. What certain homosexuals want to do is disrespect the heterosexual orthodoxy and co-occupy a word for their own use – marriage. The hard facts are that legalisation of same-sex marriage will compromise the institution of marriage and thus will undermine the family built on the foundation of marriage.

It has been known since the dawn of history that a family unit consisting of a man and a woman is the best nurturing environment for children.

Aside from the incredible damage same-sex marriage does to the well-being and normal development of children, by offering an alternative to a bedrock institution, same sex marriage calls into question all traditional values. There is a strong correlation between the rise of homosexual marriage and the weakening of traditional matrimony.

And Karl Marx's loyal pal Friedrich Engels, in his work, The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the States, disclosed the game plan in a single, succinct plan: change the concept of matrimony, and the traditional family will cease to exist. And once the family is gone, society will fall apart. Knock out the cornerstone, and the whole edifice will crumble, which is precisely the ultimate goal of the progressive (aka revolutionary communist) movement.

Need further proof? From the 1963 United States Senate Report on Communist Goals for America, Congressional Record - Appendix, pp. A34-A35

Line items 25 and 26, 40 and 41 of 45 Goals:

25. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV.

26. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as "normal, natural, healthy."

40. Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce.

41. Emphasise the need to raise children away from the negative influence of parents. Attribute prejudices, mental blocks and retarding of children to suppressive influence of parents.

So beware of any politician who openly supports same sex marriage, as they are nothing more than a follower of the teachings of their true prophet – Karl Marx. Progressives like Greens leader Christine Milne, Labor’s Penny Wong and sadly the Liberal’s Malcolm Turnbull have all placed the destruction of matrimony high on their list of priorities. Social upheavals have always opened the floodgates of debauchery and pornography. The progressive leaders see the moral decay as a means of undermining the foundation of the society’s greatest structure - the family.

Undoubtedly, the overwhelming majority of rank-and-file homosexuals are well-meaning people who have sincerely bought into the myth peddled by their leaders that the marriage license is the ultimate token of recognition of their normalcy. They know not what they are doing. But the sinister shadows behind the curtain know better, and there shouldn't be any illusions about their ultimate intentions: they want nothing less than to bring down the capitalist system, and they view their movement as a battering ram to shatter its principal bastions, America, the United Kingdom, Canada and Australia. Bringing down the traditional family is a crucial step in that direction.

 

Follow Andy on twitter